What creates the social curse of gender inequality?
Anne Nealibo Dickson-Waiko – pioneering gender academic

The rigging of the 2017 election: (1) You were very wrong Australia

Mark Davis
Mark Davis

MARK DAVIS

Journalist Mark Davis has abstracted the main issues of a comprehensive report by the Australian National University’s on the 2017 Papua New Guinea national election. Beginning today, we present Mark’s summary in four parts. The ANU report documents a scandalous election replete with threats, malfeasance and corruption.
You can link to it in full here

CAIRNS - The Australian National University has delivered a devastating and incontrovertible account of the 2017 Papua New Guinea election

The report calls into question the legitimacy of the current regime of prime minister Peter O’Neill and the future of the nation’s parliamentary democracy.

The long-awaited ‘2017 Papua New Guinea Elections - Election Observation Report’ reveals the systematic corruption of the election by Mr O’Neill’s ruling People’s National Congress Party, other parties and candidates, the PNG Electoral Commission, the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary, the PNG Defence Force and other elements of society.

It is an extraordinarily detailed report who’s unique and invaluable data is based on direct observation by a team of 258 including 32 PNG academics and researchers as team leaders, 31 ANU-based academics and students, 192 PNG observers and three support staff.

It is unprecedented in detail, scope, and intensity, covering all four PNG regions, and 69 of the 111 electorates, including detailed studies of 44 electorates.

Detailed observations were conducted of 945 of the 10,825 polling stations, and 7,510 citizens were surveyed individually.

Observations were carried out over three months from the start of the campaign period to post-polling, amounting to more than 6,500 person-days, and were recorded in template journals kept by each observer.

The report is a showpiece of election data and analysis - it is delivered in lay language and clearly based on a foundation of well-coordinated and comprehensive field coverage by a qualified and knowledgeable team.

It has the ring of absolute authenticity and it pulls no punches.

The report gives the lie to claims by Mr O’Neill, then Australian foreign minister Julie Bishop and Australian officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) that the election was free, fair and successful.

It was not.

The report demonstrates that on virtually any basis the election failed, and that the forming of a government by the O’Neill regime was illegitimate. Papua New Guinea can no longer be seen as a free and fair parliamentary democracy.

ANU lists and provides astonishing detail of corruption of the electoral process, including blatant rigging of the electoral roll by PNC and the Electoral Commission, widespread manipulation of voting, vote-counting and post-polling by electoral officials, political parties and candidates, partisan violence and intimidation by the police, the Defence Force, electoral officials and political parties and candidates, widespread bribery, ballot paper fraud from the highest levels down to polling places, ballot box tampering, extensive voter fraud and other illegalities and failure of proper process.

Irregularities continued through to the declaration of seats and the return of writs.

At least 204 election-related deaths and many hundreds of injuries were identified, along with widespread damage to government and private property, which continued long after the election. Recent police shootings and other activities in Port Moresby and Alotau, the capital of Milne Bay Province, are election-related and involve the participation of the notorious Baker Gang on behalf of a Milne Bay candidate.

The report refers to other examples of the involvement of criminal elements in the 2017 election. The true toll of death, injury and property damage is unlikely to be ever known but could be substantially higher than estimated.

The long-delayed publication of the report, formally announced this week at the University of Papua New Guinea in Port Moresby, raises questions about attempted Australian political and bureaucratic interference in its release.

It is 20 months since the formation of government in PNG, and long past the report’s original publication deadline. It is known that the Liberal National coalition government and DFAT are strongly opposed to the report.

It will also infuriate the PNG government, which is one of the most corrupt regimes on earth and operates behind a veil of secrecy, deceit, dishonesty and disinformation. Never before has its corruption been so brutally and comprehensively exposed.

DFAT and the Australian government also have good reason to be infuriated - the report exposes as nonsense a post-election statement by then foreign minister Julie Bishop, which said:

“The Australian government congratulates PNG, one of our closest friends and partners, on its successful election and we look forward to continuing to work with prime minister O’Neill and PNG’s new government.

“The [Australian] government will consider the reporting and observations from electoral observers about the conduct of the election when that information is made available.”

Over to you, Australian foreign minister Marise Payne.

Mark Davis worked as a media adviser to Sir Mekere Morauta, former prime minister and Member for Moresby North-West in the national parliament

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Philip Fitzpatrick

I think I can speak for most of the PNG Attitude readers in saying that we knew this right from the beginning.

Were we amazed?

No, it was just par for the course.

Were we amazed at Australia's reaction?

No, ever since offshore processing of asylum seekers commenced we knew that whatever PNG politicians did our government would look the other way.

Do we feel for the poor people of Papua New Guinea?

Bloody oath, they don't deserve what's happening to them.

This is the nightmare that many expatriates and honest Papua New Guineans had when independence was on the horizon.

That nightmare has now come true.

William Dunlop

I have commented on a number of occasions on the former foreign minister Julie Bishop's capabilities in that role.

Best relegated to the role of a flower judge at agricultural shows.

Bernard Corden

Julie Bishop was merely a flower pot. Just sat there and looked pretty for the cameras with resplendent Kallis pearls, Armani haute couture with Christian Louboutin red shoes.

As I have stated in previous posts her judgement must have been clouded by over exposure to ambergris and patchouli incense oil at the Airways Hotel day spa.

Good riddance.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)