The looming & crucial question of Bougainville independence
Bougainville’s referendum show hits the road

'Feelings of fear': Kiaps, police & the PNG people


TUMBY BAY - Joe Herman, in PNG Attitude, has joined a growing list of Papua New Guineans who have alluded to the feeling of fear induced by many Australian kiaps in the days before independence.

At the same time, some of those kiaps have expressed surprise that they or their cohorts created that perception or were ever regarded in this way.

Like me, I think that a lot of kiaps went out of their way not to convey any overt authoritarian or oppressive power imbalance in their day-to-day dealings with the people they administered.

As a group of administrators that were very thin on the ground and deeply embedded in often remote societies under their care, such arrogance was never an effective tool. Cooperation, more than anything else, was the key to their success.

They did, however, hold responsibility for administering, among other things, the rule of law, which had certain sanctions attached to it that had to be applied without fear or favour.

Juggling this necessity with effective administration was always a tricky business. There is supposed to be a difference between fear and sanction but sometimes the two become mixed.

Ever since human beings have been organising themselves into communities there has been a need for clearly defined modes of behaviour. Whether codified or simply acknowledged, the rules attached to social behaviour have always required some form of enforcement.

In less sophisticated societies this method of enforcement relied heavily on fear. If an individual crossed the line it was often necessary to take brutal steps to discourage others from doing the same thing.

Thus, especially in Europe and Asia, we had the development of sadistic methods of torture and execution for major crimes and punishments way out of proportion for minor offences.

Pre-contact societies like those in Papua New Guinea were usually no different than their cousins in Europe. Effective sanctions were largely based on fear.

If your own society dealt with crimes against the social order in often brutal ways is it any wonder then that people in Papua New Guinea, who had only recently been brought under foreign control, would feel a level of fear about their new rulers?

That is the theory at least. There are exceptions however.

One of these is highlighted by Mathias Kin in his book ‘My Simbu’, where he describes the heavy-handed tactics of the Australian administration before World War II in parts of the highlands.

Having helped with editing Mathias’ book, I have thought long and hard about this matter. My conclusion, unexpressed until now, is that much of that history, especially the killings, can be put down to two things.

The first is the savage behaviour of the Papua New Guinean police and the second is the inability of their kiap officers to control them.

My conclusion about incidents in which kiaps were directly involved and personally accountable for the deaths of people is that these incidents, whatever the cause, occurred during dangerous clashes with warlike people who severely underestimated the power of those they were up against.

That said, the stories of such clashes were well known to many people and no doubt added to their anxiety about the kiaps and especially the police under their control.

The police, as we are well aware, have never shaken this perception.

In recent times, continuing brutality and other bad behaviour has added to their reputation. For many Papua New Guinean policemen, fear is a legitimate tool of trade.

The other point made by Joe Herman is that there were some kiaps who revelled in their power and abused it.

Thankfully those individuals were rare. They were also well-known among the kiap fraternity. Some had their services terminated while others were barely tolerated. The individual that Joe names in his article was one of the latter.

Finally, it is worth noting that this arrogance was not confined solely to a few kiaps. Among other administrative departments there were tyrants and ogres who took great delight in preying on susceptible people.

Whether this was more pronounced in Papua New Guinea because of its isolation and circumstances than back home in Australia is difficult to say.

You will notice I haven’t said anything about local Papua New Guinean kiaps. By 1975 they were on the ground in relatively large numbers. Ross Wilkinson has documented 487 and he is still gathering data.

I suspect the people might have regarded them much as they did their Australian counterparts but I can’t be sure about this. Perhaps it is a topic for later.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Bill Gammage's book about Jim Taylor and John Black's 1938-39 Hagen Sepik patrol, 'The Sky Travellers' is worth reading if you are interested in the relationship of the kiaps and their police and how the latter used this to their advantage. Here is an extract:

"The police, knowing that the 'mastas' civilising mission meant conquest, were more warriors than citizens. Warriors fought people who showed hostility, including refusing to trade. This slightly extended the 'mastas' doctrine of force but was precisely what the police or their fathers experienced when 'mastas' first came. They thought their behaviour ethical: Kobubu spoke of it freely, and carriers said that Jim and John endorsed it. Yet carriers and clanspeople were clear that thefts and shootings usually occurred when whites were not there, and the police hid much. They knew that in 'mastas'' terms they did wrong."

Joe Herman

Excellent piece Phil. I think the village elders and the administrators had parallel experiences.

The discussions at the station during the day and the hausman in the evenings were different as if they were talking about two entirely different events.

Neither one was either right or wrong.

Concerning fear, the policemen were the effective agents in driving it into the society’s very core physic. I did not understand the command structures but do remember watching public beatings by policemen.

It did not stop there, one afternoon a policeman shot my uncle’s unsuspecting pig on the newly built road side. We only guessed what his next target might have been.

I think it was in the early 1970s the police force had its own department command structure. There was a brief relative calmness and sense of optimism. I remember riding with Inspector Ben at the Wapenamanda Police and got to know some of the policemen.

This was short-lived when the mobile and the riot squad units were introduced. These policemen stopped and terrorized anyone on the roads at will.

It is now a common and painful scene endured by many villagers when the police drive up and burn down an entire village and inflict property damages when they cannot arrest a suspect who might have hidden in the area or just simply to keep the fear alive.

Adding to this are the “rogue policemen’s” behavior. They have morphed into legalised monsters with little accountability.

Mathias Kin

Well written Phil. I must say some of the police at the time were arrogant and took part in acts their superiors would never allow.

Two of the shootings featured in 'My Chimbu' were cases where the man in charge took the first shot killing the first warrior.

Then the others, including other kiaps in the patrol, also shot at indigenous people killing many people.

These killings were never reported properly in patrol reports. In 'My Chimbu' these previously unheard Chimbus who suffered the loss of a loved one have spoken.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)