Open letter calls on PNG police to investigate Jimmy Maladina
Well targeted aid could get where the big guys don’t

Why are there are no women in PNG’s parliament?

Dr Kerryn Baker
Dr Kerryn Baker was told that money politics and the bribing of election officials greatly affected the chances of women candidates succeeding

STAFF WRITER | Pacific Women | Australian Aid

CANBERRA - Papua New Guinea has a history of extremely low rates of women in parliament. Only seven women have ever been elected in over 40 years and no women were elected to the 111 seat parliament in 2017.

To try to find out what is stopping women from winning elections, Kerryn Baker spoke with a group of unsuccessful candidates and examined the impact of the introduction of the limited preferential voting system on them.

Dr Baker is a research fellow in the Department of Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University. In September 2017, she spent time with 26 women from all four of Papua New Guinea’s regions who had contested the 2017 national election.

In general, women contesting PNG elections have fewer financial resources than men running for election. The candidates identified this as a challenge, because well-resourced campaigns are often the most successful.

The candidates noted that, to counter this disadvantage, women candidates in separate seats – and even sometimes in the same seat – would often work together. They would share transport and coordinate events as well as arrange preference-swapping deals and provide moral support to each other.

Candidates suggested nurturing these networks, using them for mentoring and to support women who want to enter local level politics.

It was expected that the shift from first-past-the-post to preferential voting in 2007 would increase the electoral chances of women candidates. It was thought that women would have better chances in the electoral contest through the collection of preferences, as opposed to the winner-takes-all result from a first-past-the-post system.

Dr Baker proposes that the shift to limited preferential voting does not seem to have helped women’s electoral chances at all beyond a few isolated cases in 2012. Rather, she argues that an unintended consequence of limited preferential voting has led to further disadvantage for women candidates.

Specifically, limited preferential voting has resulted in an increasing prevalence of money politics (including vote buying and gifting). These practices disproportionally impact on women candidates, who do not generally have access to the financial resources to participate in that type of political behaviour.

Candidates speaking with Dr Baker highlighted that the practice of money politics and the bribing of election officials was detrimental to the chances of women candidates. The participants felt it was vital to deal with these issues of money politics, along with electoral fraud and failures in electoral administration before women’s political representation would increase.

Dr Baker also heard from candidates that it was important to start election campaigning early. While campaigning is not allowed outside the official period, the participants stressed the importance of being well-known by visiting the electorate throughout the electoral cycle.

Making their intentions to run early would also allow more time to raise funds and may discourage male relatives from deciding to run, which could possibly split the vote.

Dr Baker asserts that changing the formal rules of the election process, such as through a change to the mode of elections, is only one element required for a change in women’s political representation:

“Institutional reforms are layered onto existing rules and norms, related to political culture and electoral behaviour, that are firmly established and unyielding; these existing institutions can hinder or even subvert the goals of reform,” r Baker said.

“In Papua New Guinea, this broad political context includes the widespread acceptance of money politics as part of the political system, and a patriarchal political culture that works against women. Thus, the limitations of any electoral system reform in producing significant gains for women are clear.”

Dr Baker’s paper on the experiences of women candidates can be linked to here. Her paper on the impact of the introduction of the limited preferential voting system can be found here.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Arthur Williams

I campaigned for a provincial seat in 1987 after 17 years living in the electorate. A candidate in an adjoining electorate informed me, “You haven’t got a chance as you have done little campaigning!”

I explained to him that I might not have done very much since the legal campaigning period began but that in fact I had lived, worked, socialised and worshipped with the people of my area for 17 years. They knew all about me including any bad things and also the good. I won.

I think the now long established way of diminishing the prospects of a woman winning is for clever party hacks to persuade a woman she should stand as 'you have a good chance!’

This happens with several of the main parties and we have woman versus woman vying to win. The answer to this is as you say - pool resources and all female candidates advise electors to vote strategically by casting preference votes 1,2, 3 for women only.

I recall the first election I ran in 1972. Three small islets were one local government seat and the incumbent had been there from the establishment of the council. A good councillor too.

After closing the polls, I would publicly count the votes and pronounce the result. To my amazement the only female candidate had no votes.

After congratulating the winner, I was able to speak to the lady. “Why didn’t you vote for yourself?” I asked. Her answer has lasted with me: “Mi seim long votim mi iet!”

'I was ashamed to vote for myself!'

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)