Bougainville cracks down on public service corruption
PNG budget – loss of discipline heralds rough ride ahead

We need politicians wise before the event, not after

Phil Fitzpatrick at mic
Phil Fitzpatrick - "It is obvious 'cruelty and ignorance' play a big part in the O’Neill government and governments before it. We might even call APEC cruel"


TUMBY BAY - Cher Bono, perennial pop singer, actor, activist and part Cherokee Native American once wondered what it would be like if she could turn back time.

Quite a few politicians have had the same thought. John Howard in Australia tried very hard to turn back time and US president Donald Trump is engaged in a similar but decidedly more destructive exercise.

In a less grander style, we also have politicians who, having served their time, trying to return to it by pushing what they consider to be the wisdom they gleaned from their past political experiences.

Some of the ideas they now peddle can be enlightening but you can’t help but wonder why they didn’t plan and act on them when they were in power.

When asked, they excuse themselves by explaining they were constrained by their political party or by external pressures beyond their control.

They were, they explain, forced to march to the beat of a drummer whose tune they didn’t particularly like but which they had to obey.

In everyday terms this is called ‘selling out’ – compromising their beliefs and letting down the people who voted for them.

Politicians of every stripe and in every country, including Papua New Guinea and Australia, are capable of selling out. I’m sure you can think of many examples. In Papua New Guinea, for instance, think Michael Somare.

This begs the question of why we should listen to them now.

Having said that, I would argue that there are a few politicians still worth listening to: those who stuck by their guns, fought hard but unfortunately failed to change anything for the better.

Among those I’d list people like Barry Jones, boy genius and Labor stalwart whose potential eventually came to nothing.

He recently wrote an article called ‘Saving Planet Earth’ for The Saturday Paper summarising the present state of world politics and pointing out what needs to be done now.

In the article he points out how historians and political scientists have divided recent world history into two distinct periods, before and after World War II.

The period before World War II, Jones says, was characterised by “aggressive nationalism – trade wars, high tariffs, brutal colonisation, World War I, totalitarian rule in Russia, Italy, Germany, the Leninist-Stalinist model of Communism, Fascism, Nazism, the Great Depression, World War II [and] the Holocaust”.

After World War II: “As Christopher Browning recently put it in The New York Review of Books, ‘the post-World War II structure of interlocking diplomatic, military and economic agreements and organisations …. have [mostly] preserved peace, stability and prosperity’”.

Jones then alludes to the new “wrecking ball” approach that Donald Trump and others are taking to all the institutions that were set up as part of this process. Jones calls this new political phenomenon “illiberal democracy”.

He also outlines the existential struggles it has produced: “Vested interest and the short term are preferenced above the longer-term public interest in the US, Australia and many other nations. Homo sapiens has been transformed to Homo economicus.”

All values have a dollar equivalent. If politicians cannot place an economic value on maintaining the rule of law with refugees or taking strong action on climate change, then they are not worth pursuing.

Universities have become trading corporations. With ‘fake news’, people can choose their own reality. Science is discounted. Opinion is more important than evidence. The politics of anger and resentment displaces the politics of rationality and optimism”.

Jones puts the situation down to the lack of political leadership and the failure of the IT revolution to raise the quality of political engagement and debate.

He charges social media with actually debasing the system so that “cruelty and ignorance have become tradeable commodities in Australian politics”, with debate “oversimplified and infantilised”.

His comments remind me of President Berzelius Windrip in Sinclair Lewis’ 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here. To get elected the president promises all the poor, angry voters that he will make America proud and prosperous once more.  Sound familiar?

At the end of his article Jones says “All nations, and all people, must dedicate themselves to protecting our global home rather than the short term national, regional or tribal interest”.

He doesn’t mention Papua New Guinea but it is obvious that “cruelty and ignorance” plays a big part in the O’Neill government and governments before it. We might even call APEC cruel.

We might, however, conclude that his comments about political debate don’t apply because it hardly exists in PNG at the moment.

Perhaps history does indeed repeat itself and we are now in a period of dire historical repetition.

Whether we should listen to politicians echoing a past that they only seem to remember is another question altogether.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Paul Oates

Like many other before and since, Barry Jones ran foul of the political system when he thought he could sail above it though intelligent debate and factual discussion.

We recently have heard a constant and continual bleating by a new force to be reckoned with. The 'Millennials' are starting to make themselves heard above the incessant pressure to 'download the App' and get more involved in social media.

Apparently us Baby Boomers are all at fault for causing all the world's problems and are being held responsible for the dire straits Millennials find themselves in. Why it's an absolute travesty that Baby Boomers are now about to depart and leave the Millennials a world that is reportedly spiraling out of control.

Why can't we see the plight of the Millenials in that they can only continue to enjoy the results of our passing generation's labours if they now look like having to work hard at keeping themselves in the manner to which they have become accustomed.

They have now decided on the the perfect 'Convenient Cop Out'. They have worked out they are going to inherit a world they don't want with all it's social media, expensive life styles and rotten expectations of global warming. Can't we imagine how hard it is to switch off your smart phone just because you're driving your unmuddied, Off Road SUV vehicle or actually trying get some sleep at night? Imagine the gall of encountering a bully sending you an SMS when you can't bear to not look at your phone or simply delete the idiot?

What a rotten trick to leave the energy hungry world to them to fix! Why they may have to find solutions to the age old human problems of a hungry world, thirsty for power and food and water.

So when did we make all those disastrous decisions Phil? I don't remember making any world shattering decisions at all as I tried to pay back mortgages at 17.5% and pay school fees etc. etc.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)