Mathias's legacy: A major history of the Simbu people emerges
A society that perpetuates women living a death-row sentence

There’s APEC, but we still have a country to run & to build


Patrick Kaiku

PORT MORESBY - Later this year, Papua New Guinea will host the APEC leaders’ summit, a platform which government officials are will showcase PNG.

In recent times we have seen a flurry of events staged including sporting carnivals, multilateral summits and regional cultural festivals and are now accustomed to the argument that such occasions are necessary to display our country to the world.

But really how effective are they as methods of conducting diplomacy? What criteria are used to assess their outcomes? For instance, do they make more positive the attitudes and behaviour of foreigners towards PNG?

PNG bankrolls the staging of these events in the hope of demonstrating its offerings to the world. But another important avenue are public diplomacy initiatives.

Well targeted public diplomacy can be a cost-effective alternative to expensive public occasions. And it seems that the practice of public diplomacy is not very well understood by Papua New Guinean officials.

PNG currently does not have any coherent guide itself to what its global audience might be. In the absence of this kind of information, it stages events that are hard to measure against clearly stated objectives and hard to quantify in terms of their true effectiveness.

This year’s APEC summit could be used to initiate a comprehensive review of how PNG conducts its diplomacy in general and, more specifically, how it established its public diplomacy priorities.

The aim of public diplomacy is to positively communicate a country’s image to a foreign audience using a variety of communication tools. It is intended to build relationships: understand the needs of other countries, cultures and peoples; communicate our own points of view; correct misperceptions; and look for areas where we can find common cause.

It is concerned with a “nation’s influence on the international stage and its image in the mind of international stakeholders”.

Former Australian foreign minister Gareth Evans once said, “the images which others carry of us influence their attitudes towards us – not in a general sense but also with regard to our security requirements, to our goods and services, to our appeal as a place to invest in, to migrate to, to visit and so on”.

Public diplomacy is relevant to PNG because, in certain sections of the global community, we are still associated with cannibalism, lawlessness, sorcery-related killings, corruption and other negative connotations.

These days, modern technology ensures that whatever transpires within the borders of PNG is quickly impressed on the minds of foreigners. And often these impressions are not positive.

According to a 2014 report, PNG has one of the lowest ratios of tourist revenue to GDP in the world. As well as income, this also denies us opportunities to learn about the global community and the global community to learn about us.

Most foreign affairs ministries use internet technology to make their countries accessible to a global audience. Public diplomacy requires internet savvy. It can be argued that PNG’s official internet-based communication platforms need improvement.

PNG’s foreign affairs department should use web-based communication for practical activities such as data gathering or engaging with foreign audiences on foreign policy positions or global issues.

Currently PNG lacks the most basic baseline data in understanding our reputation and credibility globally. So we rely on hosting events to showcase the country in the hope that people will like and respect us.

But knowing precisely one’s target audience matters if we are to be serious about influencing global perceptions.

More importantly, PNG must not be constrained by its smallness in the international system. In public diplomacy, there are major contributions by small states in ideas, knowledge and innovation.

Small states like Estonia punch above their weight in contributing global public goods. The Estonian government has created a national brand around the idea of innovation and technological improvement. This is the niche that defines Estonia as much more important than its size might suggest.

Currently there is an emphasis on how global sustainable development goals can be achieved by signatory states. PNG has the ability to initiate initiatives on climate change, ocean management, forestry conservation and cultural resources. These could be PNG’s niche in global cooperation and an area for the conduct of public diplomacy.

A practical way to promote PNG would be through facilitating the work of non-government organisations establishing knowledge hubs, biological resource centres and other facilities for scientific research.

Research and scientific hubs are now preferred means of information-sharing. Resource-driven economies such as Norway and Botswana are transitioning from exporting natural resources to preparing human capital for an innovation and knowledge-driven economy. Qatar is investing in education and research and promoting educational hubs as the best medium for cross-cultural dialogue and understanding.

These are just a few cases of how public diplomacy can exercise a transformative affect on even the smallest countries.

If small states are lacking traditional measures of power, the ideas and values they promote on the global stage can still elevate their influence and stature.

It is not beyond us.

Patrick Kaiku is a teaching fellow in the Political Science Department at the University of Papua New Guinea


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bernard Singu Yegiora

Interesting point of view.

I support the idea of knowledge hubs. Teaching foreign policy at tertiary level is challenging because we do not have an existing cadre of foreign policy or IR academics who are researching and writing about PNG. At the moment I am cutting my way through a thick virgin forest with no mentors or assistance.

I am happy that the foreign minister and the PM and NEC office respectively have Facebook accounts. Many of the speeches and activities are published their for public consumption and academic purposes. The Department of Foreign Affairs is a bit way back compared to Immigration Services in regards to web based communicating.

I also concur with the point made by Prof. Schram. As a rookie in the quality assurance business, at the tertiary level many of our programs have a long way to go. I hope the new Form 6 circulated by the government's Department of Higher Education, Science, Research and Technology and the PNG National Qualification Framework will help improve the higher ed landscape.


Whether we agree or disagree with the staging of Apec the fact is that it is happening so we need to focus now on how PNG can best get the most out of it.
Education is the key to nation building & poverty reduction.
“PNG has one of the lowest ratios of tourist revenue to GDP in the world.”
Tourism I think is the industry PNG should focus on and get as much aid & advice at Apec on how best to grow the Tourism Industry in PNG. The advice should be practical and not academic.
A Possible Tourism Blueprint & Policy That Is Actually Practical & Planned & Best Optimize the Attractions.
1. Identify all the exceptional Tourist Attractions In PNG: Cultural(tradition,dress, ceremonies etc),Natural (Beaches, Caves, Rivers, etc) – Fauna & Floral (Underestimated Potential) etc.
2. Determine the type of Businesses(i.e eco friendly) that best suit the Particular Attraction and the Infrastructures Required To Service that area.
3. Determine the Involvement of Villages & the spinoff businesses that they can do. Village Stay & Experiences that will require Villages being trained in areas of business skills, health & hygiene etc.
4. Plan on Population Size & Environmental Sustainability & Cultural Sustainability.
5. Tourists are Kings & Queens & Violence Is Not Tolerated Campaigns. Initially A system Of “Safe” Areas To Visit which should encourage other areas to become the same when positive developments in ordinary lives of PNG Citizens is seen.
6. For Tourism To Work Cheap Airtravel Airlines must be encouraged in PNG along with affordable accommodation & transportation.

Tourism Development requires(Town Planning) major infrastructures such as roads, airports, telecommunications, health facilities etc. which should help improve villages lives and also enable them to sell i.e agricultural & artefact produces.

This could be the chance to Invite High Profile People such as the world Philantroplists,Scientists,Entrepreneurs etc. who have not visited or know of PNG and who can make a difference in PNG to do so.
Apec could be the place also to make sure that the unique Flora & Fauna of PNG(other countries also) if any are commercialized ie. Developing new medicines or new plant varieties that PNG in some way must benefit through maybe a royalty system and a good % of this going to the people in the area where the particular Flora 0r Fauna is found.
Life really is a personal experience & we can be very helpless and must just adapt to whatever happens.

Philip Fitzpatrick

There is a much simpler way to counter the negative perceptions of Papua New Guinea.

Stamp out corruption, correct the law and order problems, institute sustainable logging and resource development, fix the schools, provide an efficient health care system etc. etc.

These are all doable and once they are done word will get round.

Albert Schram

Indeed the only way to build a nation, is patiently and slowly by education the population at large. For tertiary education, a university education should not just produce sustainable employment, but also promote personal development and active citizenships. In 2012, the Rudd/Garnaut report clearly indicated the PNG Universities needed governance reform, a focus on academic quality, and of course appropriate investment, in particular to provide broadband internet to the public universities. None of this occurred. None of the universities meets the 13 basic quality criteria, and none of the programs in business and engineering have been internationally accredited. It is unclear whether the government or the universities councils are committed to achieve these goals. Meanwhile the students have lost voice in university governance and the UPNG and UNITECH SRCs remain suspended.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)