New study reveals dangers inherent in land registration
An anniversary not to be celebrated – 5 years of inhumanity

Justice for the Kanakas: Australia’s ‘invisible’ Melanesians

South Sea Islanders  Mackay  1907
South Sea islanders (kanakas) pose in front of a house in Mackay, Queensland, 1907. Kanaka was a Hawaiian word meaning 'human being'

FRANK JORDAN | Australian Humanist

BRISBANE - In 1901 the Commonwealth of Australia came into being with the federation of the Australian colonies. Among the first laws passed by the new Australian parliament was the Pacific Island Labourers Act, ordering the deportation of black Melanesian workers known as kanakas.

Other aspects of what became known as the White Australia Policy have since been rectified, but this shameful stain on our past has yet to be properly addressed.

The process was planned in stages over several years and there were some amendments. In 1901, about 10,000 Pacific islanders were living in Australia. By 1908, the process was officially completed with the closure of the Pacific Island Branch of the Queensland Immigration Department. Just 1,654 kanakas were officially allowed to remain, and around 1,000 stayed on unofficially.

The practice of recruiting Melanesians was called blackbirding. Kanaka was a word the Hawaiians working on whaling ships used to describe themselves, and meant 'human being'. It came to be used for all Pacific Islanders.

The first instance of blackbirding recorded in Australia was in 1847 when Captain William Boyd landed sixty five men from the New Hebrides with his schooner Velocity.

However the trade started in earnest in 1863 when Sydney politician and merchant, Captain Robert Towns arranged for sandalwood trader Henry Lewin to recruit islanders from Vanuatu, for his cotton plantation on the Logan River near Brisbane.

The American Civil War had disrupted cotton production there, and provided an opportunity for others to enter the market while prices were higher. Cotton was a labour intensive crop, and the kanakas became a cheap source of this labour.

Over a period of about forty years about 60,000 kanakas were brought to Queensland to work mainly in the expanding sugar industry.

Mackay was the unofficial capital of sugar country and one contemporary commentator wrote that: “Were it not for sugar, that town (Mackay) would in all probability, consist of a couple of stores and a pub or two, with a population of fifteen to twenty souls, and the land in the hands of squatters. But now, though small, it is one of the richest and most thriving towns in Queensland.”

The kanaka contribution to the economic development of Australia was significant. As well as the sugar industry they contributed to the development of farming and grazing, the maritime industry of pearling, mining, the railways and domestic service and childcare.

In popular history, blackbirding is portrayed as slavery. But while there were atrocities in the early days, this is not an accurate portrayal.

Clive Moore, in his book Kanaka: A History of Melanesian Mackay, gives a different assessment, stating: “recruiting in its initial stages was primarily by deception. Equally, research findings stress that kidnapping is not a continuing theme as the recruiting trade progressed into the 1880’s, 1890’s and early 1900’s: recruiting became a voluntary affair. The change came not from any substantial alteration in European attitudes to Melanesians or from better government of the Pacific Islands, rather it developed with increasing awareness amongst the Islanders of the real nature and benefits of the labour trade and life on the plantations.

An awareness which made kidnapping unnecessary and impossible in later years. He goes on to add: “It is demeaning to the intelligence of the Melanesian people to presume that they presented themselves to be kidnapped from the same beaches on the same islands, generation following generation, for forty years or more”.

Another convincing argument against the concept of slavery comes from Hector Holthouse in his book Cannibal Cargoes: “the Queensland government, in 1884, banned the trading of rifles to islanders and the sale of rifles to returning recruits. The outcry from every northern planter, storekeeper, and recruiter was immediate.

“Most kanakas recruited solely to get firearms and ammunition, and they always went back to their islands well supplied. …. Irate recruiters were quick to point out that French and German traders had moved in to supply the islanders’ needs. Returning recruits began bringing £10 or so of their pay back home with them so they could buy their firearms there.”

Slaves with guns doesn’t seem a viable business model!

The kanakas who remained in Mackay were treated heartlessly. In July 1919 ’foreign’ born kanakas were prohibited from working on European farms. This was on top of a cyclone in 1918 which destroyed many of their houses, and the Spanish influenza epidemic of 1919, which killed prominent Islanders.

An astounding 30% of kanakas died in Australia before they could return to their islands. They had little immunity to European diseases and measles in particular often proved to be fatal.

Kanakas in the Queensland cane fields
Kanakas in the Queensland cane fields - 30% died in Australia before they were able to return home

Between 1885 and 1905 the Queensland government controlled the wages of deceased islanders and was supposed to return the money to their next of kin in the islands. Little effort was made to do this. Around 85% of the money was kept by the administration. The money stolen would today be worth around $40 million.

When the trade was terminated after 1908, the islanders in Australia were isolated from their families in the islands. This was particularly cruel for a people where community and family were culturally important. In recent years there have been increasing efforts by people on both sides of this divide to reunite with their relatives, but this is being hampered by restrictive laws.

Particularly tragic is the situation of Australian aboriginal women who married South Sea Islander men and returned to the islands with them. They have been effectively cut off from their aboriginal heritage and relatives. Around 150 such families have been identified as having this direct connection back to Queensland.

In 1972, Robert and Phyllis Corowa established the Australian South Sea Islanders United Council and activists lobbied for recognition of ASSI as a separate group. A 1992 inquiry by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission recommended that South Sea Islanders be formally recognized as a distinct disadvantaged group and be given access to health and welfare schemes similar to those for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders.

The Keating federal Labor government accepted these recommendations in 1994. Queensland was slow to act, but eventually the Beattie Labor government formally recognized them in 2000, and acknowledged their contribution to Queensland’s development.

On Sunday 18 December 2011 a joint media release by Bill Shorten, Kevin Rudd and Martin Ferguson announced a Seasonal Workers Programme beginning 1 July 2012. Workers from East Timor, Kiribati, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu would be able to work in the horticulture industry for a limited time each year. “Australian employers … will now be able to access a reliable, returning seasonal workforce.”

After an absence of a century, a Federal Labor government had revived the kanaka trade!

The scheme restricts workers to a particular industry where wages are low, and insists they return after a short time, replicating the racism of the blackbirding days and the White Australia Policy. While there are no longer the shocking atrocities of the earlier period, similar problems have been resurfacing.

In 2017 Federal Circuit Court Justice Michael Jarratt struggled to imagine a more egregious case of worker exploitation. Twenty-two Vanuatu workers had been paid little or nothing for their work, and Justice Jarrett described their exploitation as “appalling”. In 2017 attention was drawn to the deaths of 12 Pacific Islander workers on the Seasonal Worker Program in the previous five years, six of whom had died in the past 13 months.

Since the 1973 Trans-Tasman Arrangement, New Zealanders have had the right to work and live in Australia with only a few restrictions. They haven’t matched the contributions to Australia’s development made by the South Sea Islanders, nor suffered the same cruel exploitation. The real criterion for this favoured treatment seems to be racial. Instead of reviving the kanaka trade, Vanuatans and Solomon Islanders should be treated as equals, and given the same access to Australia enjoyed by New Zealanders.

While natural justice would indicate this course of action, there is also a strong case for self-interest. Australia spent $2.6 billion and 14 years on the RAMSI mission to build political and economic stability in the Solomon Islands after it descended into turmoil. How much easier and cheaper it would be to just allow Solomon Islanders access to jobs in Australia.

They will gain skills not available at home and their remittances will stabilise their economy. American Samoa has one of the most viable economies of the Pacific Islands, because of the remittances from the USA.

Greater cultural exchange would also be a bonus. Many people already know that bungee jumping originated in Vanuatu. But who knows that the Australian Crawl of 1901, which became freestyle, originated from Roviana Lagoon in the Solomon Islands? What else is there, that we could learn from one another?

An implicit ‘White Australia Policy’ continues to impact negatively on the Australian South Sea Islanders, as well as those in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands. They should be allowed to reunite their families and share in the wealth of Australia that they helped to create.

They should have the same rights to live and work in Australia as New Zealanders. Ask your local member of federal parliament to make this happen.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Philip Fitzpatrick

It also seems that Mutton Dutton and Julie Bishop have been actively undermining our relationship with New Zealand.

This has upset the acting Kiwi PM, Winston Peters, to the extent that he's suggesting our historical relationship is just about kaput.

Might have to wait until our planets realign before even considering a Pan-Pacific alliance.

Chris Overland

Frank Jordan's assertion that the current scheme that allows people from the South Pacific to work in Australia's agricultural industries is a revival of the kanaka trade will no doubt resonate with some people.

Similarly, the idea of some form of free association between the Pacific and Australasian states will be attractive to many idealists.

However, to my mind he is merely playing the guilt card about Australia's lamentable past treatment of people of colour to justify his proposal without necessarily thinking through the logical consequences of what he is proposing.

First, let me say that I am instinctively attracted to the idea of a Confederation of Pacific and Australasian States along the lines of the European Union, but without some of its unattractive anti-democratic features.

However, there are some very real issues to be overcome before Australia and New Zealand could look seriously at this idea.

For example, it is fair to say that governance arrangements in many of the smaller Pacific countries leave much to be desired. As a consequence their public sector management of services like immigration, border control, quarantine, health, public finances and so forth is, typically, very patchy in terms of its probity, effectiveness and efficiency.

Sadly, there is much evidence of endemic corruption, incompetence and ineptitude being prevalent in these countries.

Unless and until these sometimes quite grave internal deficiencies can be brought to a manageable level it is inconceivable that either Australia or New Zealand could agree to something like the Schengen Agreement that governs movement within the European Union.

There also would be major problems in establishing mechanisms to determine equivalency between various trade and professional qualifications obtained in Pacific educational and training institutions and those awarded in Australia or New Zealand. These problems already exist with many European countries, India and even the USA.

The health status of prospective immigrants or workers would be an issue too. PNG now has endemic levels of HIV infection and well as a growing problem with Multi-Drug Resistant TB. I understand that there has been a resurgence in the incidence of diseases such as Leprosy as well.

I mention these things not because I don't like the idea of free movement but because there are very real and substantial issue that have to be addressed first.

Idealism and great ambition are a fine thing but, eventually, reality intrudes into the calculation.

We are a long way from where we need to be if a fundamentally worthy idea is very to become reality.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)