Kerenga Kua says he will work for Peter O’Neill’s ouster as PM
A Kiap’s Chronicle: 14 - Ambunti

99% chance PNG election was biased: O’Neill & Gamato’s shame

Ghost voters hugely favour PNCPAUL FLANAGAN | PNG Economics

As foreshadowed in his last article, Paul Flanagan has undertaken additional & sought independent statistical analysis on the strength of bias towards the Peter O’Neill’s ruling People’s National Congress in Papua New Guinea’s 2017 election, in which counting is slow and still only about one-quarter complete. “Possibly there is some cause other than the electoral commissioner not performing his duties to the standards expected by the people of PNG,” Paul writes in a note. “To clear his name, he should release more information, the type of information he should have given to the electoral advisory committee before it resigned” - KJ

PAPUA New Guinea’s election has unquestionably been biased in favour of the O’Neill government.

The army of 300,000 People’s National Congress ghost voters - over 6,000 for every PNC electorate on average - is almost a statistical certainty. It is a level of gross manipulation that even surprised me.

My last article indicated some extraordinary differences in the numbers of “ghost voters” (or “excess electors”, or “inflated rolls”) when comparing PNC electorates to non-PNC electorates.

These used simple statistical tools – totals and averages – but detailed statistical regressions by an independent expert indicate a higher than 95% probability (so 19 chances in 20 – pretty high odds!) that the election has been biased in favour of the PNC.

That figure is 99% when five statistical outliers are removed (99 chances in 100). This is an extraordinary pattern of bias – one rarely found in statistical analysis in the social sciences.

When determining statistical relationships, sometimes statistical outliers are identified. Five were identified by the model.

The following graph is based on excluding the five outliers – leaving 84 electorates in consideration. It shows that the O’Neill PNC electorates had on average 6,349 ghost voters.

Non-PNC electorates had a negative number of 621 – people would turn up to vote and find their names were not on the roll.

Some of this is accidental or chaotic, but the statistical analysis indicates much of this is most likely deliberate – 99% most likely!

There will be many tricks ahead as the O’Neill government continues to play the advantages of incumbency (such as delayed counting and claims of failed elections in key areas where Morauta and Polye had strong claims).

Electoral commissioner Gamato needs to take responsibility for this biased election and resign.

The public has a right to know what actually happened to the 2017 electoral roll, the reasons for the chaotic distribution of ballots with inadequate numbers going to key anti-O’Neill areas (such as the universities), the very suspicious pattern of slow counting in potentially key alternative government strongholds, the reasons he has started to hide from the press and why he attacks commentators for simply using the same comparison he used on 9 April or figures he’s earlier distributed.

The election advisory committee should reform and advise the governor general, notwithstanding the limits on their power, which electorates should be declared failed.

Ialibu-Pangia and Tari would seem prime suspects for being declared failed with unacceptable last minute gerrymandering and statistically improbable voter turnout figures.

Fortunately, the public backlash against PNC is so powerful that despite the clear bias in this election, there still remains a historic chance for change.

May the anti-O’Neill forces be able to find enough common ground to form a new government.

My next article will deal with the ludicrous attempt by the electoral commissioner in a media release issued on Friday to defend these biased practices.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Peter Sandery

A very big thank you to Paul Flanagan for the time and money he has spent on this exercise to show beyond a shadow of doubt what most of us have known but not been able to assemble in such a meaningful way, for some time.

Paul Oates

What tends to confirm Paul Flanagan's statistical evidence is that both the Electoral Commissioner and the Caretaker PM have not hurriedly presented any evidence to the contrary.

Couple that with the lack of any information to the appointed review committee and one can only draw a single conclusion.

Some expected problems now exist for a new PNG government if indeed it comes into being.

If those who have enjoyed the benefits of power now try to hold on to it, the unfortunate backlash we have seen in Finschhafen may escalate across some parts of the country where a losing candidate's supporters won't accept the outcome.

Secondly, if it looks like the anti PNC O/N factions will unite and form a new government, will they be able to satisfy their supporters since the government coffers have been emptied long ago. Promising the 'benefits' of government may be therefore somewhat difficult to deliver in practice.

Thirdly, any new coalition, and it will have to be a coalition, must be quickly able to convince the nation that it will govern for all PNGians.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)