My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2006

« Brisbane, you really are a good old town | Main | Diane's blog records life in the slow lane »

30 January 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Papua is still a protectorate under the British Crown proclamation made by Her Majesty Queen Victoria in 1884.

The Papua issue is not a constitutional matter but a covenant - a treaty between the Crown and Papuan chiefs. Papua treaty chiefs (heirs-in-succession) were restored in 2015 and are functioning to restore Papua sovereignty as independent state declared in 1888.
_______

Papua, now known as the southern region, is constituted as a part of the independent state of Papua New Guinea. While some people may still hope for Papuan sovereignty, the reality is that this has long since been extinguished - KJ

The Papua Act was passed by a Commonwealth country. Is Papua or British New Guinea. Papua has its own flag. Are Papuans British citizens?
________

Papua was a British colony and later an Australian territory. New Guinea was a German colony and later a territory mandated to Australia after World War I.

You can see a representation of the former British Papuan flag here https://www.google.it/search?q=papua+flag&rlz=1C1GGRV_enES752ES752&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=d1AuAUf841_88M%253A%252CZIbrwtCuO1VlvM%252C_&usg=AFrqEzdG9871-RUG_IZcMnl56GdpAHNILQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiMlau38Z7dAhUN-aQKHcQMB0UQ9QEwD3oECAMQCg#imgrc=Tm93KVR-9byZhM:Papuans

And what was a proposed German New Guinea flag here https://www.google.it/search?rlz=1C1GGRV_enES752ES752&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=QDCNW_m1Ke7jkgWy-4HACw&q=%22german+new+guinea%22+flag&oq=%22german+new+guinea%22+flag&gs_l=img.12..0.10021.12914.0.15153.2.2.0.0.0.0.113.218.0j2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.2.217....0.BW_Qkth-YGw#imgrc=22NTh5lLT1Ff_M:

Papuans are citizens of Papua New Guinea - KJ

If Aussie are reluctant to take Papua as the seventh state give total independent Papua a country of it own.

I wish to clarify my previous comment.
I am not sure about the free education aspect or point made. But I am inclined to to agree with the points made on possible requirements to become an Australian citizen.

I support the views expressed in the first article dated 30 January 2009. I was born in Port Moresby in 1962 to Papuan parents. I think the approach to claim Australian citizenship is correct and may work.

I someone who has additional information in this this regard and assure you that we need to arrange a meeting with this guy to understand this clearly and discuss openly to come to some sort of an agreement and plan to execute to be granted Australian citizenship.

Await your reply and comment.

Jonathan Baure, spokesperson for the Papuan Plaintiff Group, who is spearheading the case for Papuans born before PNG's independence to be recognised as automatic Australian citizens, must be congratulated by every Papuan for his tireless efforts (refer to the news article, "Papuan group shows gratitude to Australia", The National 18/03/10).

Papuans, like Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, are a forgotten generation since we were robbed of Australian citizenship on 16 September 1975.

Hon Kevin Rudd must acknowledge that fact now and apologise to the people of Papua for that grave and serious mistake. Australia should admit and apologise for its oversight on Papua's issue since 1975.

Australia - it is high time to act for Papua now! This issue needs to be settled once and for all - immediately!

Where do we start with this one. Your correspondent is wrong to premise his/her argument on "free education" for Australians. Whether it's a full fee-paying course or subjected to HECS, Australian students pay some sort of fee. If it's an MBA as stated then it certainly is not free to anyone.

The basis of the argument about citizenship is the subject of much debate, literature and several court cases. The following is pertinent:
http://www.citizenship.gov.au/_pdf/aci/chapter15.pdf

The following is also very pertinent to the argument and would be seen as the precedent: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/media/Ame_v_Vanstone.pdf

Your correspondent would need some form of passport to travel into Australia for the purposes of MBA study and the most logical would be a PNG passport because he/she would be made to jump through hoops such as the cited case of Mr Ames.

The acquisition of a PNG passport would be seen to be the assumption of your correspondents natural right to PNG citizenship regardless of whether he/she signed the necessary papers on or after September 16 1975.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)