My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2006

« Police minister will "personally fix" crime issues during APEC | Main | »

11 September 2018

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The kiaps have nothing to do with the current crime and military-style/heavy-handed policing in PNG. This is a home grown problem. Rather than trying deflect it we need take responsibility for the mess being created.

One of the perennial problems for historians is separating fact from fiction.

History is a notoriously murky subject, capable of being interpreted or reinterpreted because the facts change or new facts emerge or, sometimes, simply because we choose to perceive the facts differently.

This is why there can be so many histories of the same event or time or place in which different authors reach different conclusions about what happened.

Thus, Geoffrey Blainey and Manning Clark, both eminent historians, wrote very different histories of Australia. To this day, aspects of Australian history emphasized (or de-emphasized) by each of these great scholars are hotly contested in the so called “History Wars”.

I have recently read a splendid book called “The English and Their History” by Robert Tombs, in which the author takes a very different and forensic view of English history to that usually reflected in classical scholarship. Tombs’ exposes how myth, confusion, bias, misunderstanding, misreporting and omission have all contributed to what the English understand to be their collective history.

With this in mind, it is a bit frustrating for me to read that PNG supposedly has “a longstanding tradition of military-style and heavy-handed policing, and some of my fellow countrymen assert direct links between this behaviour and that of some kiaps under the previous Australian colonial administration.”

It is not that this statement is entirely wrong, simply that it is misleading.

That there were incidents of the heavy handed behaviour by some colonial officers is hardly contestable. The murderous actions of Assistant Magistrate C.A.W. Monckton during his notorious patrol through what is now the Oro Province are a prime example of what now would be regarded as criminal behaviour.

Even at the time (c1900) Monckton’s “shoot and loot” approach to law enforcement excited equally strenuous expressions both of support and condemnation.

Of course, Monckton’s actions were not a reflection of the administration’s overall policy in relation to law enforcement. Generally speaking, the law was applied with a measured hand.

A great deal of latitude was used in both policing and the courts so as to take into account the cultural and traditional contexts within which criminal behaviour occurred.

Thus, the 32 men eventually brought to trial for the murders in 1953 of Patrol Officers Gerald Szarka and Geoffrey Harris and Constable Buritori, were each sentenced to death but this was commuted to ten years imprisonment with hard labor.

Had they been Australians tried for such a crime in Australia, it is almost certain that at least some of them would have been hanged but the appellant judge evidently took into account the traditional and social context of their actions.

I mention these two examples simply to illustrate the range of behaviours in relation to law enforcement that occurred during PNG’s colonial era.

Consequently, characterizing law enforcement during that time as “heavy handed” is both misinformed and misleading and certainly not supportive of any assertion that subsequent behaviour by the RPNGC after independence was or is directly linked to how kiaps went about enforcing the law.

The writing of PNG’s history is a work in progress. Historians like Mathias Kin are striving to write histories from the perspective of the colonized rather than the colonizer.

This is important work but future generations of Papua New Guineans will not be well served if actions or motivations attributed to the colonial administration reflect less than a carefully balanced assessment of the available evidence.

Of course, we old kiaps will not be around much longer to defend our legacy. Soon enough we will all have passed into the long night of history, having played our parts and left the stage.

We mostly were and are neither saints nor sinners, just ordinary men who were once called upon to do an extraordinary job in the dying days of European imperialism.

I think that our collective hope is simply that our actions will be judged fairly based upon the available evidence, not through the distorting prism of ideology or post colonial mythology.

I urge PNG’s emerging group of historians to heed Oscar Wilde’s famous aphorism that “the truth is seldom pure and never simple.”

This is the best way to ensure that your work stands up to forensic examination of the type practiced by Robert Tombs in his review of English history which, even after more than a thousand years of scholarly consideration, still provokes controversy.

I don't think even a 'tongue in cheek' Mea Culpa on behalf of the Kiap system is required Phil. No one should ever claim the Kiap system was perfect. No system ever is.

It did however work with almost no resources and without any real backup.

It was also responsible to the Minister and could be held accountable.

"Papua New Guinea has a longstanding tradition of military-style and heavy-handed policing, and some of my fellow countrymen assert direct links between this behaviour and that of some kiaps under the previous Australian colonial administration."

I guess if you are looking for a scapegoat to excuse all your own faults the kiaps are as good as anyone.

One of our own gave you Peter O'Neill, after all.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)