My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2006

« Dr Schram is a great man, but he should respect our courts | Main | Basil hints at Chinese model as Facebook faces PNG shutdown »

29 May 2018

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Question appears less that of Schram seeking to prove his innocence.

More is is that the case against Schram needs to be proved at 12 June, whether or not the 'appliance' is attendant in person.
_________

He was on bail. Albert has no legal option but to reappear (unless the judge in his mercy decides to discharge him but a committal hearing still hangs over his head) - KJ

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)