My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2006

« Lumai - the design label celebrating Papua New Guinean women | Main | Counting the cost of a devastating earthquake – many uncertainties »

11 March 2018


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

'Science Daily' should revisit their notion on Vanuatu being the 'most linguistically diverse place on Earth per capita.'

SIL International places Vanuatu behind PNG (1st) and Cameroon (2nd) whilst UNESCO also has PNG (1st) and Vanuatu (2nd) on their Linguistic diversity index rankings.

In the lexicon of the academics 'Papuan' is a term that describes Proto-Melanesians and Aborigines and is not linked specifically to what we now know as Papua.

In a general sense the term describes the people who migrated to both New Guinea and Australia in prehistoric times.

I guess if you believe the view that "'They came from New Britain, a Papuan island just east of New Guinea,' Professor Spriggs said.", then everything else makes sense.

But...Rabaul as part of Papua? Let me ponder on that. And New Britain people are Papuans?

Any views from that neck of the woods? Or from the Rabaul experts?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)