My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2006

« | Main | Resources benefit PNG but people shape the benefits »

02 September 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

UNHCR's pin up boy Albert Eintsein provides a rosy narrative of the advantages of settling refugees in any country. PNG will miss out on the type of impact, positive in nature, the refugees will bring to the country.

I watched on SBS news <http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/08/28/asylum-seekers-fill-jobs-australians-refuse-do> how those Tamil asylum seekers were used to clean up regional south-east Queensland. They did the dirty jobs that Australians did not like doing.

Hey Felix, it took two prime ministers to tango....

Australia, I beg you to stop your aid diplomacy dilemma. PNG is not your puppet, OK?

Papua New Guinea never had the "heart" or a genuine cause to accept the asylum seekers in her land. It was all for wrong reasons.

That is, there were incentives for Peter O'Neill's government (rebuilding the Angau Hospital and other huge infrastructure projects) should it successfully resettle all in PNG soil.

Initially the constitution of the country didn't have the provision to facilitate. However the government used it's numerical strength to pass laws in retrospect to validate.

But frankly, in bringing in asylum seekers and wanting to provide high level service and care, the PNG government has failed terribly and appallingly to manage it's own citizens.

How can it's manage foreigners when PNGns are on the street without proper care and services in the villages? PNG doesn't even have a proper record for its population boom yet - it's claimed we are now at seven million.

Look, it was genuine and heartfelt concern but the way it was handled was dubious. It looks like a cargo cult scam that Australia wanted to lure money to solve a problem that PNG doesn't have the capacity to solve successfully.

This puts things into perspective.

Italy rescues 5,200 asylum seekers just since last Thursday.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/italy-rescues-5200-asylum-seekers-from-boats-in-mediterranean-20140609-zs1dx.html

And Australia relaxes immigration laws to allow cheap migrant workers into the top end.

http://www.australiaforum.com/information/jobs/employers-in-northern-australia-to-get-concessions-on-overseas-workers.html

An Australian Prime Minister has the right to ask PNG to help it process its boat people, for a quid pro quo.

It is immoral for any Australian and any PNG Prime Minister to agree that after being processed any (boat people) refugees should be resettled in PNG.

PM Rudd may not have had the luxury of being able to make moral decisions. PM Abbott does not have the luxury of being able to make immoral ones!

As I said at the time of the Rudd - O'Neill announcement: the "deal" between PM Rudd and PM O'Neil, is the most amoral ever between our two countries.

To assume that refugees can in effect be guaranteed PNG citizenship (whether they want it or not) is in any way in accordance with PNG Constitution and Laws of PNG is unconscionable.

That any two leaders of any "democratic" countries could make such a deal on their desperate unconsidered whims should shame the citizens of both countries.

Both Australia and PNG must work together to find acceptable Third Country Resettlement of all genuine refugees."

Yes! Manus? Wrong solution to a genuine and heartbreaking problem!

2000 refugees have perished in the Mediterranean sea over the last few months. Don't want to see the same thing happen between the Indonesian coast and Christmas Island.

Australia and other governments in the region need solidarity, help and support on how to address the serious issue.

But how can you think of resettling thousands of foreigners in PNG? Where? To do what? Under what level of security, health and education for the children? And what about family reunification?

Now Australia will take genuine refugees out of Manus one by one in a quiet way and send home those for whom it is safe enough to do so.

Then they have probably to agree with Indonesia to establish processing centres back there for those rescued at sea and work with the United Nations either for their resettlement or repatriation.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.