My Photo

Visit My Other Accounts

Facebook Twitter
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2006

« Police attack people protesting land grab | Main | Chinese say PNG relationship yields “sweet fruits” »

09 October 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

As a Papua New Guinean, personally I have not benefitted from any aid from Australia.

When we had no water for years growing up in Hohola - there was no AusAID, when I went to primary school at Eki Vaki and shared one desk with two other students - where was AusAID?

When we shared one text book among the 30 of us in class - where was AusAID? When we couldn't use the school toilets because it was beyond a child's ability to figure out how I was going to put my bum on all that stink - where was AusAID?

Mate, this was almost 20 years ago and even to this day it hasn't changed. And the question begs - where is AusAID?

It is paying the dumb consultants they send to this country to create models for six months and then leave for the next consultant to come back and create yet another one overriding the previous one and there just no real results.

We don't need these consultants sitting in whitewashed walls pushing paper. What we need is hands-on individuals who are out there with the poeple building wells, schools, desks, new facilities and getting the local people involved.

Practical wisdom. That's what needed.

I agree, but more talk on a partnership at the top but 'long tambolo' they don't seem to hear very well!

For starters on a partnership model - start by getting Papua New Guineans to manage the aid program - but hey that needs trust right? And for my tuppence worth, that's kind of still perpetually premature!

The aid program will be a better vehicle for development if it were not tied to managers coming from Australia and New Zealand under a special agreement that allowed that.

It was a battle of sorts to get that special treatment extended to PNG firms!

Ah kain toktok ya - mi les long dispela longpela debate back and forth, year after year (some of us have got bubus and grey hair and still the same old same old).

Can we see the proposed partnership model pleazz or an appropriate model that is mutually agreeable and beneficial. I don't think anyone has actually sat down to work on a model! or have I missed something?

We tried doing it through a treaty but that's probably not enough because trust with a big T is not in the vocab - serious trust that is - the doing and practicing kind! Kain olsem.

I support the call made by Julie Bishop. You don't help a man by giving him fish every day for his meals, you help a man by teaching him how to catch fish.

Giving him fish everyday makes him rely on you and your fish-aid. Just food for thought-Chinese philosophy.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.