My Photo

Visit My Other Accounts

Facebook Twitter
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2006

« Gauging AusAID's effectiveness in PNG* | Main | AusAID in PNG: any way forward from here? »

19 June 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Hi Albert - It's easy to get distracted about some issues, especially when they concern national borders that were imposed by others many years ago.

If I remember correctly, Sir Anthony Siaguru led the PNG negotiating team that formalised the current border arrangements and these were drawn up after listening to and respecting the local people's wishes.

My understanding is that there is acceptance of the traditional rights of all users of the Torres Strait specified in the border agreement.

This aspect is pretty significant when you look at many other border arrangements between neighbouring countries elsewhere in the world. It demonstrates a real partnership between PNG and Oz doesn't it?

I suspect the local mayor was not so much complaining about the people who are using the area or about Australia's commitment to helping our neighbours who use the Strait.

The concern, as I understand it, was over matters of law and order in that part of Australia. Everyone must respect Australian law if they are in Australia just as much as anyone in PNG must respect PNG law if they are in PNG.

Australians and their government should not complain about Papua New Guineans frequenting their northern shores.

PNG's southern coast EEZ [exclusive economic zone] is not within the 200 nautical miles as per the international law of the sea.

Australia's northern EEZ extends so far beyond its limit to include Western Provinces traditional fishing waters. In fact Australia has the third largest EEZ in the world.

The UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf confirmed in April 2008 that Australia has rights over an additional 2.5 million square kilometers seabed beyond the limits of Australia's EEZ.

So, if you Australians want more territory, you should be willing to cater for the welfare of the indigenous inhabitants.

There is so much historical and anthropological evidence that supports the western [Papuans] rights to access the Torres Stait. They should not be dinied of their inalienable rights by a single arrogant and inconsiderate boundaries drawn without concern for them.

It is only ethical for Australia and its citizens in the Torres Strait to tolerate PNG's Western Province people's presence there without prejudice and unneccessary complaint.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.